Connect with us


Manhattan District Attorney Reveals How Donald Trump Allegedly Committed 34 Felonies



The media company’s first “catch and kill” involved a janitor at Trump Tower trying to sell a story about a child allegedly born out of wedlock to Trump. The American media paid the doorman $30,000 for the rights to the story, which later turned out to be fake, but never published it. The second “Catch and Kill” was about McDougal, who claimed he had an affair with Trump while he was married in the early 2000s. US media paid McDougal $150,000 to keep the story from going public, prosecutors said.

In a conversation recorded in September 2016, Cohen allegedly told Trump that he would open a bank transfer company for McDougal and said he spoke with the Trump Organization’s chief financial officer about “how to set it all up.”

“So how much do we have to pay for this?” Trump asked, according to the district attorney’s office. “One fifty?” he added before offering to pay in cash.

Prosecutors allege that Cohen disagreed and that Trump offered to pay by check.

After Access to Hollywood a tape of Trump telling host Billy Bush that he was grabbing women “by the pussy” went public in October 2016, according to prosecutors, American Media’s editor-in-chief put Daniels’ lawyer in touch with Cohen to silence her. However, Trump allegedly did not want to pay the $130,000 himself, so Cohen agreed to do it on his behalf.

The men delayed paying Daniels until October 2016, when Cohen opened a Manhattan bank account for the shell company Essential Consultants LLC, prosecutors said. Cohen then transferred $131,000 from his own house line of credit to an account before transferring $130,000 to Daniels’ attorney as a silence payment.

After the 2016 election, Trump paid Cohen monthly payments that prosecutors allege were disguised as legal fees.

After Trump won the election, the US media released the Trump Tower janitor and McDougal from their non-disclosure agreements. Prosecutors say he met privately with Pecker before and after Trump’s inauguration to thank him for destroying the doorman and McDougal stories.

In January 2017, the Trump Organization’s CFO agreed to pay Cohen monthly payments for a year as part of a “withholding agreement” that prosecutors said was a sham. A year later, Trump and Cohen allegedly met in the Oval Office to confirm a debt settlement agreement.

In February 2017, Cohen emailed an invoice requesting payment, which was approved by the Trump Organization and sent to accounts payable with instructions to “Charge for legal fees. In the description, indicate “advance for January and February 2017”.

Prosecutors say Cohen did this 10 more times, and each invoice falsely stated it was for a retainer agreement. Trump also allegedly paid Cohen personally for nine payments, with the checks including false statements.

“A total of 34 false entries were made in New York City business records to cover up the original secret payment of $130,000,” Bragg’s office said in a statement. “Furthermore, the participants in the scheme have taken steps that, for tax purposes, have distorted the true nature of the refund.”

In August 2018, the FBI issued a search warrant for Cohen’s home and office, after which, according to prosecutors, Trump told him during a phone call to “stay strong.”

Cohen eventually pleaded guilty to eight criminal charges, including tax evasion and making false statements to a financial institution. In September 2018, the American media entered into a non-prosecution agreement in exchange for cooperating with the investigation.


This court race in Wisconsin is very partisan. It wasn’t always like that.



Wisconsin’s election today will be closely monitored as it affects the state’s high court partisanship, and abortion rights and election rules are frequent campaign topics. The contest between Daniel Kelly, a conservative former state Supreme Court justice, and Janet Protasevich, a liberal Milwaukee County judge, should be one of the most important and expensive elections in the country this year.

Judicial elections in Wisconsin are officially non-partisan, but the races are becoming increasingly political. While in the past, voters typically voted for judges with whom they were not ideologically aligned, Democratic counties now strongly favor liberal judicial candidates and Republican counties favor conservative ones.

This trend has intensified in recent years as partisan polarization has increased at the national level and as overt partisanship has crept into the dialogue between court candidates.

It wasn’t always like that. During the 1980s and 1990s, racing was largely seen as less biased and more dependent on support from leaders in the legal and law enforcement community, according to Charles Franklin, survey director at Marquette University School of Law. Hello studied the relationship between ideological voting patterns in state supreme court and presidential races.

“The Supreme Court races at the time seemed to be about who got more approval from sheriffs and prosecutors than anything else,” he said.

While many candidates in the 1980s, 1990s, and early 2000s had clear ideological leanings, there was almost no connection between electoral support for judicial candidates and presidential candidates from the respective political party. A prime example is Dane County, a longtime Democratic stronghold that is home to the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In 2000, a majority of voters in Dane County voted for Diane Sykes, the conservative candidate for judge, as well as Al Gore, the Democratic presidential candidate.

Over the next decade, partisan views began to infiltrate racing. In a particularly vicious 2008 campaign, Conservative candidate Michael J. Gableman launched a television ad falsely accusing his opponent, the only black justice on the state Supreme Court, of securing an early release for a rapist who was also black. Mr. Gableman won by a small margin. Since leaving the bench, he has led a biased investigation into whether there was election fraud in Wisconsin during the 2020 presidential election.

But since the election of Republican Scott Walker as governor in 2010, the races have become more overtly partisan. to remember him. The 2011 Supreme Court race was widely viewed as a referendum on Mr. Walker’s policies. David Prosser, the Conservative candidate, narrowly won the election, which was decided by 7,000 votes and required a recount. This race was also one of the first times in the state that the ideological voting patterns in the judicial race almost perfectly mirrored partisan votes in the last presidential election.

A 2015 campaign to change public finance laws led to a significant increase in political spending by allowing unlimited donations to political parties. Parties could transfer large sums to candidates, and enhanced coordination with outside groups was allowed. This year’s race will break records for refereeing competition spending, with candidates and outside groups spending three times the cost of any previous competition.

This election should be the most politically oriented to date, Mr. Franklin said, citing “growing money, growing ideological signals, growing ties to party voting.”

“This election is something more,” he added. “Much more.”

If the 2011 contest was seen as a referendum on Mr. Walker, today’s is seen by many as a referendum on abortion and whether the issue will continue to inspire voters in the state. The winning candidate could be a pivotal vote later this year when the court considers an 1849 trigger law that makes abortion a felony in the state except to save the mother’s life. The law took effect after Roe v. Wade was flipped. Judge Protasevich has been outspoken in her support of maintaining access to abortion, while Judge Kelly has been less outspoken on the issue, although he has received endorsements and donations from anti-abortion groups.

Mr. Franklin sees the race as a test of Wisconsin voters’ support for the more open, partisan discussion of “values” that has become a hallmark of Judge Protasevich’s campaign.

“If Protasevich wins, it will demonstrate that open campaigning for political values ​​can reach voters in judicial elections,” he said. “If she loses, there will be huge doubts.”

Reid J. Epstein made a report.

Continue Reading


Treasury replenishes tax breaks where fossil fuel jobs have been lost



Manchin, DW.Va., said the administration is deviating from the goals of the law. The gap was sharpest due to subsidies for the purchase of electric vehicles. On Friday, Manchin said the Treasury Department’s rules for tax credits defy Congress’ intentions and undermine efforts to boost U.S. manufacturing and secure supply chains by moving them out of China.

The release of new standalone guidance and funding for communities dependent on coal and fossil fuels could please Manchin, who is the second-largest coal-producing state.

Developers applying for an investment tax credit on equipment such as wind turbines or solar panels can receive an additional 10 percentage points in addition to a rebate of up to 30 percent on their investment if they meet other salary and training standards. The production tax credit for clean energy facilities could be 10 percent more.

Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen highlighted the benefits for coal mining cities. “The coal communities have the knowledge and resources to play a leading role in the growth of the clean energy economy, and additional public investment will jumpstart this process,” she said in a statement.

Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo told reporters that the extra stimulus would help communities that depend on energy jobs.

Continue Reading


Roy McGrath dies after FBI shootout in Tennessee: report



A fugitive ex-chief of staff for the former governor of Maryland. Larry Hogan was reportedly killed in a shootout as law enforcement attempted to make an arrest near Knoxville, Tennessee.

According to report at the Baltimore Banner, FBI agents confirmed to his family that Roy McGrath had died in hospital after a bus stop collision.

William S. Brennan, Jr., an attorney for McGrath’s wife, Laura Bruner, confirmed the death of the Baltimore Banner.

“Laura is completely upset,” Mr. Brennan said.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2023 Millennial One Media.