Lyft wants to “significantly reduce” its workforce as part of a company-wide restructuring. CEO David Risher announced on Friday.

The taxi company declined to give specific numbers to NPR about the potential impact of these layoffs. Wall Street Magazine informed that layoffs could affect about 30% of Lyft workers, or about 1,200 jobs.

“David has made it clear to the company that his focus is on creating a great and affordable rider experience and driving driver revenue,” a spokesman for NPR said.

“This requires reducing our costs and structuring our company so that our leaders are closer to riders and drivers,” the spokesperson said. “This is a difficult decision and we are not taking it lightly. But the result will be a much stronger and more competitive Lyft.”

Risher took over the reins of Lyft just this week, replacing company founders John Zimmer and Logan Green. But during a staff meeting a few weeks ago, Riescher told employees layoffs were “in the air.”

“We need to be a faster, flatter company where everyone is closer to our riders and drivers so we can get the job done,” he said in a public message to employees on Friday.

Affected workers will be notified by next Thursday.

Several companies in the tech sector are experiencing turmoil, thanks in part to a significant decline in digital advertising revenue. Facebook parent company Meta announced in March that it was laying off 10,000 people. Also last month, Amazon announced it was cutting another 9,000 jobs after it had previously announced that 18,000 employees would lose their jobs.

Intending to speed up resolution of its antitrust lawsuit with Epic Games, the state’s attorney general and Match Group, tech giant Google has called on the court to dismiss most arguments about its revenue-sharing agreements, app store business model, and other app stores. -related projects.

Google’s legal team has filed a new lawsuit that will provide adequate information to help ascertain the validity of Google’s claims.

The tech giant believes that none of its merchandise in the play store violates antitrust laws. If the court accepts Google’s appeal, the litigation will still continue as there are other claims that need to be settled legally. Notably, Google is looking forward to the court’s ruling on five major lawsuits that appear to be critical to a plaintiff’s ability to record alleged anti-competitive behavior.

google explanation

Google believes the court should dismiss the claim that the company’s developer distribution agreement is illegal on the grounds that it prevents distribution to other app stores. The company states that it has not established any legal obligation to distribute to other app stores. In addition, he states that new generation Android devices typically come with more than one app store pre-installed.

Google also said that if consumers choose, they can freely install additional app stores using a web browser.

According to a Google spokesperson, Android is the only mobile platform that supports multiple app stores. In fact, most Android devices have at least two built-in app stores with the ability to support others. However, Match Group, Epic, and the state’s attorney general have deliberately overlooked the flexibility and choice offered by Google Play and Android.

Apart from the play store argument, Google also hopes to close another dispute, which is mostly about a Google-managed program called Project Hug. The program was launched to encourage Android game developers to make their apps available on the Google Play Store.

Alleged bribery

Google has offered under-the-table payouts to game developers to encourage them to launch their apps on the play store, according to the parties. They also claim that the amount of the payment was huge and Google tried to make it legal by calling it the App and Game Speed ​​Program.

According to Epic Games, Google introduced the program in question because the company was afraid of its competitors. He wanted to prevent other developers from following suit after launching Fortnite for Android exclusively outside of the play store via its own installer.

The creator of Fortnite also stated that Google wanted to monopolize the system as the organization was very afraid that Epic would maintain momentum with other preset deals. In addition, it may team up with OEMs such as Samsung to reduce revenue share. However, Google is not ready to accept the allegations.

According to Google, Project Hug never intended to stop them from creating competing app stores.

According to the tech giant, Project Hug was never intended to be anti-competitive — the whistleblowers are trying to distort the program. It focused solely on motivating developers to use the Google Play Store to release new or updated content.

Applicants, on the other hand, are not prepared to accept Google’s explanation for this. They have successfully proven that Google employees often disable chat history or internal discussions to delete sensitive messages related to a case. Although Google had previously asked for a postponement of the trial, it was denied.

Google has faced numerous legal challenges these days. Last month, it lost a legal battle with the Competition Commission of India (CCI) that forced the organization to agree to changes to its Android operating system, such as stopping the practice of forcing device manufacturers to pre-install Google’s app library like Chrome or YouTube.